serial consign

Given the past examination of topics such as large-scale conversations and corporate anthropology here at Serial Consign, I thought I'd share a few videos related to community and the mapping of networks. These two videos serendipitously arrived in my news reader at approximately the same time today and provide an infrastructural and aesthetic window into collaboration, communication and connectivity.

First up is an interview with Anton Kast conducted by Kevin Rose. Anton is the lead scientist behind Digg, the "often imitated and never duplicated" community news portal. In this ten-minute conversation he provides a fascinating window into the logistics of information management at Digg, the site is currently in the process of launching a new recommendation engine in a (needed) effort to provide users with the most relevant content given their past interactions with the service. Kast is quite articulate and it is very interesting to hear his descriptions of the "correlation coefficients" that connect and quantify the interests of various users. In listening to his explanations of this new feature, I couldn't help but smile and think of the several hours I've wasted over the last two years staring blankly at stamen design's brilliant Swarm visualization at digg labs. [via david cohn]

Thankfully, this second video is far removed from the noise of the commercial web world and comes to us by way of the Netherlands-based interactive designer Jori de Goede. As evidenced by the video above (and his Vimeo channel), Goede has a keen interest in the visualization of conversations and speech. This particular video is an elegant representation of the types of social geometries that can emerge from a relatively small group of participants. I'd be curious to see the results if Goede applied this methedology to a larger group of "conversation participants" in the future. [via processing blogs]

Given the rapidly evolving nature of digital identity management and recent data portability movement, it is hard to ignore the imminent shifts in our understanding of online presence. Lifestreaming and interoperability are paradigms that have the potential to consolidate our online activity and connections across a multitude of platforms. Given these emerging developments, there have been several noteworthy developments in online "conversation management" over the last several months that are worth examining.

The first application/platform to consider reconfigures the way we think about online reading. fav.or.it (pictured above) is a web based RSS reader that has been beta-testing for the last several months. What makes fav.or.it distinct from traditional news readers is the fact that the application integrates feed comments with content, so readers' responses to a post would show up as an addendum to the original post in your reader. fav.or.it describes this process as "full cycle reading" and I really appreciate the democratic thinking behind this project as it accurately reflects the conversational nature of the blogosphere. I have to admit there are some blogs that I only subscribe to and follow because of the value the readership bring to the posts through commenting and this tool would be ideal for tracking these sites.

I was chatting with Howard Rheingold about fav.or.it over twitter a few weeks ago, and he pointed out the exponential increase in incoming content we'd all be subjected to if we used this service. While this is true, I think content/comment aggregation might inspire readers to become more dedicated and more involved with fewer information sources rather than scanning hundreds of feeds and commenting selectively.

If you are interested in learning more about fav.or.it a good place to start is the Read Write Web review from last summer. The fav.or.it development blog also has some great video interviews with Nick Halstead, the creator of the project.

Another recent project that explores the networking of texts is ThoughtMesh, a project launched by Jon Ippolito and Craig Dietrich in Vectors last fall. ThoughtMesh is a system for publishing and navigating scholarly texts. The system allows authors to apply tags to specific portions of a text and these tags are shared across the entire inventory of content residing within the system. This allows for lateral navigation through related texts and proposes an alternative to the generic footnote/endnote/reference "markup" with which texts have traditionally been annotated.

An excerpt on the inspiration for the project culled from Ippolito's author's statement:

It's no secret that today's academics are having trouble keeping up with networked media. The currency of academia remains the peer-reviewed print journal--not exactly the ideal medium for intellectual discourse in the fast-paced age of the Internet. The archaic criteria by which most universities award promotion and tenure mean that even academics who specialize in digital culture find it hard to justify writing about it in a digital vernacular. But if scholars don't want to drift ever further out of touch with the information Twittering and Flickring across the world's browsers and cell phones, they'd better find a way to tap into and redirect these information flows.

I have yet to take this system for a test drive with my own writing - I hope to plug a text into it soon. One drawback I can see with ThoughtMesh is the fact that it is closed, i.e. the content has to be placed within the system and it requires some effort to do so. I could picture a bookmarking-like interface being more efficient, but probably at the cost of diluting the purity of the taxonomies driving the system. This critique aside, I've been wandering around the database of content archived thus far and ThoughtMesh is quite an efficient navigation tool for slicing through these texts.

If you are interested in learning more about ThoughtMesh you can take a peek at the splash screen for the project, the demo video or this response to the project posted on Grand Text Auto from last October.

[expressive processing & commentpress]

In addition to providing commentary on ThoughtMesh, Grand Text Auto is the host of the final project to be examined. A month ago, media theorist Noah Wardrip-Fruin announced that he would be peer reviewing his forthcoming book Expressive Processing on Grand Text Auto. This is the first time an academic has (outright) conducted a blog-based peer review and it is a real testament to the knowledge and expertise of the community surrounding Grand Text Auto. I'm extremely excited by this gesture as perhaps it represents the beginnings of a shift within academic culture towards a more meaningful engagement with the less formal protocols of blogs and online publications.

Wardrip-Fruin is using the Institute for the Future of the Book's CommentPress system to facilitate this peer review process. CommentPress is a WordPress plug-in that allows comments to be displayed inline, alongside body text. The application was previously deployed in McKenzie Wark's Gamer Theory project.

Despite my interest in the context in which the preliminary version of Expressive Processing is being presented I haven't had much time to spend with the text itself - I'm hoping to review it here on Serial Consign sometime in the coming months.

I recommend keeping an eye on all of these projects as I feel that they are collectively emblematic of sweeping changes taking place right within the management of online discourse.