Hacking as a Way of Knowing

E-waste

The above contraption is the prototype that my team produced at the Hacking as a Way of Knowing workshop this weekend. I collaborated with Gabby Resch, Paula Gardner and Ana Viseu and in the course of 12 hours and fueled by some 36 cups of coffee we built the device pictured above. The assemblage is intended to function as a drawing machine and was constructed in the following sequence.

  • taking a turntable and removing the tonearm
  • removing the gantries from two cheap printers
  • stripping down the cartridge and print head assemblies to "essentialize" the gantries leaving just the moving parts we wanted and the power sources
  • building a jig to hold the gantries approximately 2.5" over the platter
  • building stylus devices out of solenoids and the nibs of pencil crayons and attaching them to the gantry [there is a photograph of this oddball detail here]

The idea was that this device would act as a "news seismograph" and make marks on a spinning canvas when certain keywords showed up in two custom RSS feeds (built in Yahoo Pipes). Each stylus would begin the day on the same edge of the platter and over the course of 24 hours incrementally creep to the opposite side. This drawing machine would map the frequency of two contrasting keywords (such as pandemic and containment) culled from feeds that aggregated dozens of major media outlets and information sources. When a desired keyword appeared in one of our feeds the solenoid on the appropriate gantry would be triggered and drop the stylus to the canvas for a half second. Each of the two keywords would be articulated as a distinct colour.

E-waste

This is a simple "test print" that we did when we demoed the device. At 33 1/3 RPM the canvas would rotate approximately 48,000 times in 24 hours and at the end of a day you'd have a 12" as output. What kind of distribution patterns might emerge over the course of a complete news cycle? We can only really speculate at this point as our electronics didn't work but given the fact we had such a limited amount of time (and waffled so much) we're content with the rough prototype we developed. I now have the two printer gantries sitting on my desk and I plan on trying to develop this workflow further and hopefully generate a more tangible proof of concept.

I documented our project in a photo set on flickr and in examining those images it is clear that the linear evolution of the work that I presented at the beginning of this post is quite simplified. We didn't go into this project with any kind of thesis or mandate, but instead went looking inside junk for inspiration. We gutted four printers, and several other devices and put together an inventory of possibility. All of our thinking emerged from what was on the table in front of us and we built narratives based on the moving parts, assemblies or electronics components that we happened across - it was a lot of fun. Thanks to William J. Turkel and Edward Jones-Imhotep for the invitation to participate. Keep your eyes trained on the workshop wiki as documentation from the various projects will undoubtedly be posted there in the near future.

Trackback URL for this post:

http://serialconsign.com/trackback/354

rhetorical process of invention

I love the way you developed narratives as a group/tribe for the moving parts and then assembled a machine--an inscription technology resulted from an oral narrative/ but you also made a new machine from old technological devices/parts and then connected it to "new media" technologies. Cool. The recursivity or circularity from old to new works on multiple levels. This project could also be a commentary on the process of invention as a rhetorical process where discovery is dependent on narrative formation. Excellent!

Old / New

There was actually an extended discussion about wiring one of the gantries to a high activity network like twitter and the other to the (slightly slower) pulse of big media and comparing the resulting densities. As the thing started to come together the polemic didn't seem as important and now that the polemic is more or less intact - I just want to make the gantries work! It is a fun project and I think it riffs on the past life of the turntable (and vinyl as a medium) quite nicely, now to do justice to the printer parts. :)

Hacking as the Norm

It doesn't have the new media focus of your project but Scrapheap Challenge demonstrates the appeal of hacking as a way of knowing: tinyurl.com/5pto4m - secretlifeofmachines.com is also worth a look. It reveals everyday machines to be poetic instruments of great ingenuity.

Experiments like yours have the potential to humanise the obscure/discreet/invisible/mysterious technologies that surround us and provide a way of knowing for audience as well as inventors. I think what I'm saying is, great workshop and thanks for sharing it with us.

Links

Thanks for the links Geoff! For me, a better name for the workshop would probably have been "Hacking as a Way of Thinking". I don't know much of anything yet, but what I've come out of this workshop with is a simple checklist of simple motor actions actions that I want to wire and make talk to some specific data streams. It is a lot more tangible than abstractly "learning electronics" or just tinkering with some prefab kit. I like the fact that the project and workflow are there and now I have to refine them. Although very unstructured, there was definitely pedagogical value to this workshop (to say nothing of the fun of freeform brainstorming and creative practice cross-pollination).

Podcast on E-Waste and Hacking Workshop

I thought you and your readers might be interested in listening to the new Network in Canadian History & Environment podcast episode on e-waste and this hacking workshop. We interviewed Bill Turkel, one of the organizers of "Hacking as a Way of Knowing" about the workshop and the new website for the workshop.

To download the podcast, go to:
Nature's Past: A Podcast of the Network in Canadian History & Environment
http://niche.uwo.ca/naturespast